From d82df86ebfc726b74fac2cc35d26b16bc0fadd05 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?utf8?q?Kristian=20H=C3=B8gsberg?= <krh@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 18:40:53 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Make a note about how we don't handle release-less properties.

Such as requires: glibc > 2.6.90.
---
 TODO |   15 +++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/TODO b/TODO
index 173460f..64581dc 100644
--- a/TODO
+++ b/TODO
@@ -11,6 +11,21 @@ Towards replacing rpm + yum (0.1):
 
    - store rpm headers for installed packages.
 
+- rpm seems to consider glibc > 2.6.90 to mean greater than
+  2.6.90-anything.  That is, a comparison that doesn't mention the
+  release field, shouldn't regard the release field of pkgs it
+  compares against.  glibc-common-2.6.90 has
+
+	conflicts: glibc < 2.6.90, glibc > 2.6.90
+
+  since rpm doesn't let you do glibc != 2.6.90, and
+
+	requires: glibc = 2.6.90
+
+  will always pull in glibc.  But even with a != relation, would
+  glibc-2.6.90-16 be equal to 2.6.90?  glibc 2.7.90-8 dropped it in
+  favor of requires = 2.7.90-8 (#225806).
+
 - signed packages
 
 - download (libcurl?)
-- 
1.7.1